FY26 Portfolio
12 Products
5 Platforms · 4 Pilots
PKR 2–3B Target
February 2026
10x
Scale Target
5
Core Platforms
12
Product Initiatives
FY26
Proof Year
5
Scale platforms targeting 10x portfolio growth
PKR 2–3B
FY26 portfolio volume target across all platforms
<2%
Target delinquency ceiling across all products
Q4
Go / No-Go decision point for all live pilots
STRATEGY
The Narrative: From One-Off to Repeatable Portfolio
Strategic Shift — Foundational Thesis
NCGCL’s next phase shifts from one-off guarantees to repeatable portfolio platforms that directly unlock business scale. The strategy targets three binding constraints: working capital liquidity for mass-market merchants (5M retailers, 30K e-commerce sellers), export receivables and buyer-risk barriers that block market expansion, and growth capex for tax-compliant SMEs that are commercially viable but collateral-constrained.
We will deploy five scale platforms — Digital Working Capital, Export Receivables & Buyer-Risk, Tax-History Capex, Health Facility Finance Suite, and supporting quality-linked modules — all underpinned by a mandatory expected-loss deductible standard.
Execution is gated by stop-loss triggers, graduation rules, and data partnerships so scale is achieved without capital leakage.
Five Strategic Pillars: The Architecture
Foundation for 10x Growth
1. Digital-First Cashflow Underwriting
Make data + controlled flows the default underwriting anchor across all platforms.
Approve mandatory expected-loss deductible standard
Select FY26 pilots (3–4) with stop-loss triggers
Authorize data partnerships for cashflow underwriting
⚠ Key Questions for Board
Decision Levers
What is target leverage (x) & acceptable annual expected loss ceiling?
Which PFIs/platforms are priority partners for data?
What minimum governance required for claims audits?
What coverage step-down triggers define graduation?
5
Scale platforms ready for FY26 deployment
7
Pilot initiatives in various stages of readiness
M/H
Average resource intensity across portfolio
PKR 2–3B
FY26 target guaranteed volume
PORTFOLIO
Master Product Map: Status & Execution Intensity
All 12 Initiatives Tracked Against KPIs & Resource Requirements
Product Initiative
Status
Target Segment
Primary KPI
Resource
Digital WC – Retail
Pilot→Scale
Kiryana/small retailers via distributors (5M)
PKR 500m+; <1% delinquency
Medium
Digital WC – E-commerce
Pilot→Scale
Marketplace + social sellers (30K+)
PKR 500m+; 3+ repeat cycles
Medium
Export Receivables & Buyer-Risk
Pilot
Exporters + PFIs
Multiplier ≥2x; 40% new markets
High
Tax-History Capex
R&D→Pilot
Tax-compliant manufacturing SMEs (100–200)
Capex completion; defaults <cap
High
Health Facility Suite
Launch→Scale
Clinics/labs/pharmacies/hospitals (40–60)
Quality compliance; <3% defaults
High
Education (EICGF, LCPS, EdTech)
Pilot/R&D
Schools, SPVs, EdTech vendors (5–10 districts)
Verification timeliness; <2% delinquency
Medium
Sahiwal Cluster Playbook
Pilot
Service providers, SMEs, farmers
Utilization targets; on-time repayment
Medium
GB Cluster Playbook
Pilot
Cooperatives/platform SPVs, villages
Price uplift; resilience outcomes
Medium
Eid Livestock Dealer Finance
Pilot (seasonal)
Livestock dealers + PFIs (1 Eid cycle)
≥95% season-end clean-up; nil payout
Medium
Aquaculture Finance Suite
R&D→Pilot
Shrimp farms, exporters (5 inland, <5 exotic)
80%+ survival; yield targets met
High
Expected-Loss Deductible
Immediate
All PFIs/products (100% coverage)
Lower claim frequency; stable underwriting
Low
Product Distribution by Launch Status
Stage of Development Portfolio
Platform vs Pilot Resource Allocation
FY26 Capacity Planning
Strategic Fit vs Execution Ease — Heatmap
Portfolio Prioritization Matrix
Digital WC
Export ERBG
Tax-History
Health Suite
Education
Sahiwal
GB Cluster
Eid Livestock
Aquaculture
Deductible
■ High Fit / Easy Execution■ Medium Fit / Moderate Difficulty■ High Risk / Complex
8
Binding constraints identified in NCGCL’s market
1:1
Each product maps to exactly one binding constraint
Data
Primary enabler theme for all platforms
10x
Scale multiplier target if constraints are removed
The Constraint–Solution Map: Strategic Thesis
Each Product Directly Removes One Binding Growth Constraint
NCGCL only scales if each product directly removes a binding constraint and remains operationally repeatable. No products without clear constraint removal.
1
Working Capital for Mass Merchants
Solution: Digital WC Guarantees (Retail + E-com)
Mechanism: Data-anchored underwriting via distributor/marketplace flows; revolving lines with controlled repayments
Market Impact: 5M retailers, 18% of GDP, 50%+ digital readiness. Target: Higher inventory turns, faster growth without collateral.
Digital WC: Scale; diversify PFIs; manage concentration
Export ERBG: Expand markets; tighten controls
Clusters: Sahiwal/GB live; Eid execution
Q4 · Nov–Jan (Go/Stop)
Architecture: Scale/stop decisions; repricing
Digital WC: Institutionalize as core platform
Export ERBG: Scale decision + integration
Health + Edu: Scale best modules; prune weak
⚠ Execution Risks to Watch
Critical Path Issues & Mitigation
Data
Access Delays
Without flows, WC underwriting stalls. Prioritize distributor partnerships Q1.
Claims
Discipline Gaps
Without audits, moral hazard grows. Finalize claims manual in Q1.
Conc.
Creep Risk
Single PFI over-exposure. Enforce limits by Q2; diversify continuously.
Pilots
Sprawl
Too many pilots; no learning. Limit to 3–4 per quarter; ruthless pruning.
TIMELINE
Cumulative Milestone Completion & Volume Buildup
FY26 Execution Track Record Projection
150–400
Deductible range in basis points by risk class
3
Structural risk layers in the coverage architecture
100%
PFI coverage applicability — universal standard
Q1
Target deployment quarter for deductible framework
CORE
The Expected-Loss Deductible: Core Risk Architecture
Why Guarantees Fail & How This Fixes It
The Problem: Guarantees insuring expected loss weaken underwriting. Partners know losses are covered, so they loosen credit standards. Capital leaks.
The Solution: Mandatory, non-claimable expected-loss deductible (first X bps) + layered cover above. Deductible varies by risk class and data maturity; coverage steps down as portfolios season.